Realview's stats
- Review count83
- Helpfulness votes12
- First reviewDecember 30, 2007
- Last reviewSeptember 16, 2012
- Featured reviews0
- Average rating3.2
Overall rating
1
/
5
D’Souza the naive or political agent?
PostedSeptember 16, 2012
Dialogue
2
/
5
Special Effects
1
/
5
Art Direction
1
/
5
Acting
1
/
5
Story
1
/
5
Camerawork
1
/
5
This is a very, very deceptive film that avoids the reality of Obama as simple a puppet and president of a private corporation known as the USA aka Washington DC aka a corporate property of the IMF a property of the Vatican. The film is designed to make it seem like Obama makes his own decisions ultimately some right and some wrong and completely ignores TPTB orchestrating world events. The personalization of Obama is just misdirection. Coming from southern / central India where Jesuit influence goes back over 400 years, perhaps D'Souza is simply brainwashed and naive, himself just a 2nd hand puppet of influences upon him.
Pros well paced
Cons misleading
No, I do not recommend this movie.
Share:
-6points
1of 8voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
3
/
5
Softcore porn -- but interesting characters.
PostedDecember 31, 2011
The film has it's obvious drawbacks... little left to imagination. The film is as good as the first part of the original but not significantly better if at all. The personality and raw punk nature of the female lead makes the movie significantly entertaining and more so in this version. The 30+ minutes are slow until the male and female leads get directly connected, then her added intelligence kicks the movie into high gear. Seamy characters throughout including the male lead.
Yes, I recommend this movie.
Share:
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
3
/
5
The Roman Empire at work.
PostedDecember 12, 2011
Primarily an interview based documentary.The movie shows a very interesting evolution of Jesuit/Roman influence in American Politics and the willingness to do wrong by rationals of good deeds. Sad in many ways to see so many people buying into corrupt thinking from WWII, Vietnam and on to today.
Yes, I recommend this movie.
Share:
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
1
/
5
Great info but...
PostedMay 20, 2011
Sadly enough this movie is horribly violent and bloody. A great disappointment. Yet, it has valuable information and shows some courageous individuals but for some reason they felt they had to sell the documentary with highly excessive shock value. The bottom line is that there is a great volume of statistics that show all animal foods including eggs and milk cause a significant amount of human illness. That's really all there is to know. However, I might add that they do not distinguish between raw milk and pasteurized and homogenized. The latter destroys the enzymes and fractues the milk molecule. They also didn't study vitamin c# role in preventing heart disease.
No, I do not recommend this movie.
Share:
-3points
0of 3voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
1
/
5
Hollywood, Hollywood, Hollywood
PostedJanuary 21, 2011
Terrible, Terrible, Terrible -- Saw the movie in high definition 3D. Best 3D i've seen, great high definition, awful, awful, awful movie. Typical agenda movie effeminizing the male. Really, speaking as someone who say the original 1st episode on TV, with Bruce Lee, back in the mid 60s, I can't tell you how awful this movie is. A pure insult to intelligence, to Bruce Lee's memory, to film in general. Classic use of sound and fluff to cover an absolutely terrible script!
No, I do not recommend this movie.
Share:
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
1
/
5
Boooo
PostedDecember 18, 2010
For some reason lustful, obsessive subjects attract hollywood like a fly to you know what. Hollywood puts special efforts making them stylish and special. Unfortunately it's still a mediocre, confused and often stupid hollywood flick. it's about a lady who's got obsessive problems and fears. It's a confused drama without real substance that magically conveys itself as something special. It's very strange.
No, I do not recommend this movie.
Share:
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
2
/
5
Politically correct, politically incorrect
PostedOctober 24, 2010
I found this movie disappointing. I expected more real substance about why the faults of education are and what are the real solutions. The movie is a Politically correct presentation of a politically incorrect subject. It's a watered down waste of time. It seems to praise Bill Gates when the problem really could be solved by him and he's just perpetrating the wrong. Education is bad by design. The problem with education is that it is deliberately dumbing down Americans for conquest. With some funding a web site could easily be built to teach kids the fundamentals then the rest they can get from the web and the libraries.The movie makes a surface appraisal that does some good showing how corrupt the unions are and how treasonous past city governments have been in allowing the contracts to come into existence as they have been but that's not the real problem.
No, I do not recommend this movie.
Share:
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
2
/
5
Disappointing
PostedOctober 24, 2010
This is one of those converging multiple story movies. It just doesn't work well. None of the different stories is particularly interesting. The movie is very anti-climactic. The scenes don't even come close to driving the story forward. I found myself more than once even asking why that scene was in the movie. What was the point? Matt Damon is incredibly boring. A modest amount of entertainment value. The actress is great. Some of the scenery is interesting.
No, I do not recommend this movie.
Share:
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
2
/
5
European Softcore porn flick
PostedSeptember 2, 2010
The film itself is reasonable for those without short attention deficits. The scenery is the best part of the film. The story line is fine. Clooney is by far the worst actor in the film. The detractor is the softcore porn thrown in to lessen the value of the film for some reason. The idea is a lonely killer, trained and conditioned to minimize his exposure. He reaches a point where he wants the normalcy he's trained to never have. That makes him a risk to those that handle him.
No, I do not recommend this movie.
Share:
+1point
1of 1voted this as helpful.
Overall rating
3
/
5
Entertaining confusion
PostedAugust 3, 2010
This is one of those illogical and grossly complex movies that's sold as entertainment by changing so fast so they hope you don't have time to think. Visually it's fun. Love Marion Cotillard see doesn't have the staring role but plays the trauma victim very well.
Saw it twice. Once myself and once with my daughter. My daughter found it entertaining but hatted the British kind of pointless complexity. I liked the entertainment but thought the concept was ridiculous.
Why would people who are conscious they are in a dream not turn bullets to rubber duckies I have no idea.
Yes, I recommend this movie.
Share:
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.