Share CapGoat's profile
 
Facebook Twitter
 
 
CapGoat
 
 
 
CapGoat's stats
 
  • Review count
    2
  • Helpfulness votes
    0
  • First review
    May 22, 2008
  • Last review
    December 31, 2009
  • Featured reviews
    0
  • Average rating
    2.5
 
 
CapGoat's Reviews
 
 
Overall rating 
3 / 5
3 / 5
good special effects but same old same old
PostedDecember 31, 2009
Customer avatar
from Los Angeles, CA
The special effects were excellent, but the movie was pieces of the same old same old-cowboys and Indians, the ewoks vs. the machines, and it was much longer than it needed to be.
No, I do not recommend this movie.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
Overall rating 
2 / 5
2 / 5
My worst fears surpassed
PostedMay 22, 2008
Customer avatar
from Los Angeles, CA
The movie was supposed to be set in the 50's, not made in the 50's. . The miniatures were done much better in the Japanese movies of the 50's. Practically the entire movie took place on a badly designed set. just like movies of the 50's. Totally different than the first two with all the outside scenes. Why do they make the star a baffoon when he comes back older? He got better later, but the damage was done. Cliche after cliche, and the most cliche of all 1950's ending. How could Spielberg and Lucas bring in such an incredibly low-budget looking movie?
No, I do not recommend this movie.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.