Share mixmatch's profile
 
Facebook Twitter
 
 
mixmatch
 
 
 
mixmatch's stats
 
  • Review count
    7
  • Helpfulness votes
    1
  • First review
    May 20, 2012
  • Last review
    September 30, 2012
  • Featured reviews
    0
  • Average rating
    3.6
 
 
mixmatch's Reviews
 
 
Overall rating 
3 / 5
3 / 5
not bad
PostedSeptember 30, 2012
Customer avatar
from Minneapolis, MN, USA
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:monthly
Dialogue 
2 / 5
2 / 5
Special Effects 
2 / 5
2 / 5
Art Direction 
2 / 5
2 / 5
Acting 
2 / 5
2 / 5
Story 
2 / 5
2 / 5
Camerawork 
2 / 5
2 / 5
I thought it was a good movie. I had a tough time following the story. I didn't like all the violence. I thought the story line was a little overblown.
Pros well paced
Cons too complex
Yes, I recommend this movie.
0points
1of 2voted this as helpful.
 
 
Overall rating 
5 / 5
5 / 5
good movie.
PostedSeptember 15, 2012
Customer avatar
from Minneapolis, MN, USA
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:monthly
Dialogue 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Special Effects 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Art Direction 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Acting 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Story 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Camerawork 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Very good movie. Really enjoyed it. Thought it was a very good story line. Thought the special effects were amazing. Good value for the money. The 3D was amazing .
Pros great story
Cons none
Yes, I recommend this movie.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
 
Overall rating 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Not good
PostedJune 23, 2012
Customer avatar
from Minneapolis, MN, USA
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:weekly
Dialogue 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Special Effects 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Art Direction 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Acting 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Story 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Camerawork 
3 / 5
3 / 5
I didn't like it. The special effects were o.k.. The story was unbelievable. Who believes in vampires in the 19th century.
Pros well paced
Cons bad story
No, I do not recommend this movie.
-1point
0of 1voted this as helpful.
 
 
Overall rating 
5 / 5
5 / 5
great movie
PostedJune 9, 2012
Customer avatar
from Minneapolis, MN, USA
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:weekly
Dialogue 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Special Effects 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Art Direction 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Acting 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Story 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Camerawork 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Really liked it. Had a great story line. Very interesting. Very complicated too. Great special effects. Overall a delight to see.
Pros great story
Cons too complex
Yes, I recommend this movie.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
 
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
good movie
PostedMay 22, 2012
Customer avatar
from Minneapolis, MN, USA
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:weekly
Dialogue 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Special Effects 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Art Direction 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Acting 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Story 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Camerawork 
4 / 5
4 / 5
really enjoyed this movie. great special effects. great storyline. enjoyed the actors.
Pros great story
Yes, I recommend this movie.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
 
Overall rating 
2 / 5
2 / 5
bad movie
PostedMay 21, 2012
Customer avatar
from Minneapolis, MN, USA
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:weekly
Dialogue 
2 / 5
2 / 5
Special Effects 
1 / 5
1 / 5
Art Direction 
1 / 5
1 / 5
Acting 
1 / 5
1 / 5
Story 
1 / 5
1 / 5
Camerawork 
1 / 5
1 / 5
did not like movie. did not get the story line. do not like dianne lane as an actress. do not like keven kline. thought it was a snobby movie.
Cons slow
No, I do not recommend this movie.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
 
Overall rating 
3 / 5
3 / 5
good movie
PostedMay 20, 2012
Customer avatar
from Minneapolis, MN, USA
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:weekly
Dialogue 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Special Effects 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Art Direction 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Acting 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Story 
3 / 5
3 / 5
i liked it. good story line. good special effects.
Pros great story
Yes, I recommend this movie.
-1point
0of 1voted this as helpful.