Share SnapeSnape's profile
SnapeSnape
SnapeSnape's stats
- Review count1
- Helpfulness votes0
- First reviewNovember 19, 2010
- Last reviewNovember 19, 2010
- Featured reviews0
- Average rating2
SnapeSnape's Reviews
Overall rating
2
/
5
Its really not that good...
PostedNovember 19, 2010
SnapeSnape
Don't get me wrong, it is fun at points. To summarize why i cannot say this was a good movie: it sacrifices good plot, characters, and story telling to try to be an emotional drama with very little character development and to highlight the directors inferences and sell tickets to all of the twilight craved fans.
To expand on my points, it cuts out parts of the story: and i understand its a huge book, you have to. But what they choose instead of certain parts of the story is why i complain about it. They6 focus a majority of their time on the WORST PART of the book (aka the woods). I know, i know important things happen there.... but it lingers there way way way too long. Which goes directly into another point IT TRIES TO BE TWILIGHT. I really dont remember that being a main focus anywhere in the book and when you are sacrificing for inferences like that instead of giving more time to actual parts of the book, such as KREACHER who they COMPLETELY IGNORE except for his tiny little scene (where he is funny.... which is why they should have included just a little bit more of his story.), And they also have very little character development and rough transitions between scenes.
It really was not THAT well done of a movie. Sure graphics, and acting was done well, but the part that makes harry potter great, the story, was sacrificed to the money god that producers see as twilight fans.
I know i am disagreeing with most of America right now in my review, but stop drinking the koolaid and look at the quality of the writing of the movie and you will know what i mean.
Yes, I recommend this movie.
Share:
-1point
0of 1voted this as helpful.