Share wiscman's profile
 
Facebook Twitter
 
 
wiscman
 
 
 
wiscman's stats
 
  • Review count
    1
  • Helpfulness votes
    0
  • First review
    December 16, 2012
  • Last review
    December 16, 2012
  • Featured reviews
    0
  • Average rating
    4
 
 
wiscman's Reviews
 
 
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Long, drawn out presentation, BUT excellent!!!
PostedDecember 16, 2012
Customer avatar
from El Mirage, AZ, USA
Age:65 or over
Gender:Male
Goes to the movies:few times per year
Dialogue 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Special Effects 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Art Direction 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Acting 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Story 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Camerawork 
3 / 5
3 / 5
Many of the comments are right on regarding the camerawork. There are times when the shooting was blurry. If the camera had been a little farther away, the tracking of the action would have caused less blur.
There were many times when the dialogue was less than clear. Ultimately, it was comprehensible. Comparing this to the Lord of the Rings, which was not 3D, I don't think 3D enhanced the movie; there were a couple of cute episodes, but the movie, itself did not need to be 3D.
Overall, this is an excellent prelude to Lord of the Rings, even with the cinematic flaws. I wonder how the "Enhanced" version would be???
Pros well paced, great story
Cons blurred movement
Yes, I recommend this movie.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.